GML Seminars

Visitor Information: The Visitors Center and entrance to the Boulder Department of Commerce facilities are located on Broadway at Rayleigh Road. All visiting seminar attendees, including pedestrians and bike riders, are required to check in at the Visitors Center at the Security Checkpoint to receive a visitor badge. Seminar attendees need to present a valid photo ID and mention the seminar title or the speaker's name to obtain a visitor badge. .

Upcoming Seminars

Title:

Challenges in Modeling Future Tropospheric Ozone for the federal health standards in the Denver Metro / North Front Range region

Speaker: Mr. Tom Moore
Tom joined the RAQC in February 2023 as the Planning Director, working on air quality control strategies, coordinating development of the State Implementation Plan components, and leading emission inventory and photochemical modeling analyses. He came to the RAQC after serving as the Technical Services Program manager at the State of Colorado’s Air Pollution Control Division as well as working for many years for the Western Regional Air Partnership, coordinating air quality analysis and planning for the 15-state WRAP region. He has served as the Vice Chair for the Air Quality Enterprise Board and chaired the Fort Collins Air Quality Advisory Board. Tom has a B.S. degree in Physical Geography from Arizona State University.
Date/Time: Thursday, April 16, 2026 01:00 PM MDT (-0600) Google Calendar IconOffice Calendar IconApple Calendar Icon
Location: David Skaggs Research Center, Room GC402 Google Meet
Abstract
The Denver Metro/North Front Range (DM/NFR) region has suffered from elevated concentrations of ground-level ozone (O3) for decades. While progress has been made to reduce emissions, the area continues to fall short of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), leaving difficult decisions about further emissions reductions. Increasingly hot dry summers, population growth, and wildfire smoke add to the challenge. Regional air quality improvement plans required by the federal Clean Air Act (CAA) are formulated on statutory timelines by the Regional Air Quality Council (RAQC), the designated lead air planning agency for the O3 Nonattainment Area (NAA) are developed in collaboration with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment’s Air Pollution Control Division (CDPHE APCD). These NAA-focused emission control and air quality improvement plans are evaluated and considered for approval by the RAQC Board and the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC) then submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for review and approval. USEPA prescribes and RAQC/APCD develop and apply regional photochemical grid modeling (PGM) platforms with local and regional data to evaluate a recent year as the basis of projecting air quality improvement expected by a near-term future year. Air quality planning procedures require use of a PGM platform to evaluate emission control strategies for nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to demonstrate future O3 standard attainment via modeled changes in air quality. Following USEPA procedures, the PGM inputs and results are evaluated by RAQC, APCD, USEPA, and stakeholders to determine the accuracy, precision, and representativeness of the analysis. Actual NAAQS compliance, however, is based on measured O3. Thus far, for more than 20 years, monitored O3 concentrations in the DM/NFR have generally exceeded repeated iterations of modeled projections and the region remains out of attainment, posing health risks and requiring more stringent emission control programs under the federal CAA. PGM results and supporting analyses suggest that O3 formation potential and measured impacts from different sources vary across the DM/NFR NAA; however, the accuracy of these estimates depends on the underlying quality of emissions inventories and modeled meteorology. If the amounts, spatiotemporal distributions, or chemical speciation of sources are incorrect or incomplete, the model cannot accurately simulate true O3 formation. Evaluation and improvement of PGM performance requires comparing modeled concentrations of O3, NOx, and speciated VOCs to observations. Unfortunately, the availability of such observations is limited. While APCD maintains a limited number of NOx and VOC monitoring locations, some have only recently been implemented, NOx and VOC measurements are not often co-located, and regional monitoring gaps remain. This makes model evaluation problematic. While predicted O3 can be evaluated, there has been little basis to assess whether modeled emissions of NOx and VOCs are accurate, leaving high uncertainty in projecting how O3 will respond to control strategies.

Archives